Historians and doctors have been writing about the “madness” of George III since before the king’s death in 1820 up until the present day. This paper explores the dynamics of this debate – in particular the interactions of medical historians and clinicians with on the one hand political and social historians and on the other with wider public discussion around books and other cultural responses to the king’s illness, notably on the stage and screen, and above all Alan Bennett’s The Madness of George III. What emerges is far from a simple story of more accurate diagnoses and new archival discoveries.
Please note that this will be a 'hybrid' session with a limited number of places available in the IHR Wolfson Conference Suite.
Those attending in person are asked to bring a Wi-Fi enabled laptop, tablet or phone.
Attendees will understand that this session is subject to change at short notice depending on government advice.
We ask that anyone attending this session at the IHR adhere to the latest University of London guidelines:
- We are continuing to expect that all those using our buildings wear face coverings while moving around the building and during the session. Unless you are presenting, asking a question, or you are exempt.
- Please do not attend the session if you have any covid-19 symptoms.
- Please do not attend this session, if you have not registered in advance as you will not be permitted entry.
- this event is free to attend, but advance booking is required